A neutral, evidence-focused overview of the claim titled “Tobacco Industry Cover-Up of Smoking Harms.” This article summarizes what proponents of the claim say, the primary documentary and legal records that bear on it, why the claim spread, and what remains disputed or unproven.

A neutral, evidence-focused overview of the claim that COINTELPRO was an FBI domestic surveillance and disruption program. This article separates what government records and Congressional investigations document, what is inferred or disputed, and why the COINTELPRO claim has become widespread.

A neutral, evidence-focused review testing claims about the Watergate Scandal (1972–1974). This article reviews primary records (tapes, court rulings, Senate hearings), major counterevidence cited by experts, limits of the documentary record, and what would change the assessment. Sources and conflicts are cited so readers can check the documents themselves.

An evidence-focused review of the most-cited arguments about the Watergate Scandal (1972–1974). This article lists the specific claims supporters point to, the types of sources they rely on (tapes, committee reports, journalism, prosecutions), and simple tests that check each argument against primary records and high‑trust reporting.

A sober review of claims about MKUltra (CIA Mind-Control Research Program): what government records document, what credible counterevidence and expert explanations exist, and which parts remain disputed or unprovable. This article separates verified documentation from inference and highlights gaps created by destroyed files.

An evidence-focused review of the strongest arguments supporters cite about MKUltra. This article lists the most-cited claims, identifies their source types, shows how to test them, and explains what is documented, disputed, or missing in the public record.

A neutral, evidence-focused overview of the claim called the “Watergate scandal (1972–1974)” — what the claim asserts, the documentary record (arrests, tapes, court rulings, congressional reports), how the story originated and spread through media and institutions, and which parts are documented, disputed, or remain unproven.

This verdict examines claims about COINTELPRO (FBI Domestic Surveillance Program): what is strongly documented in government records and court rulings, what remains plausible but unproven, and where sources conflict or remain redacted. We separate documented facts from inference and give an evidence score with drivers.