A neutral, evidence-focused timeline examining claims about the Watergate Scandal (1972–1974). This article lists key dates, primary documents, and turning points; separates what is documented, disputed, or unproven; and explains where historians and official records agree or conflict.

A neutral, evidence-focused verdict on the claim framed as “Verdict on Watergate Scandal (1972–1974).” This article separates what is strongly documented about the 1972–1974 Watergate events (break-in, investigation, tapes, impeachment steps and resignation), what remains plausible but unproven, and where evidence is contradicted or absent.

A neutral, evidence-focused verdict on the claim that the tobacco industry mounted a cover-up of smoking harms. This article separates court findings, released internal documents, and unresolved inferences; it assigns an evidence score and explains what is documented, what remains plausible but unproven, and what is contradicted.

A neutral, evidence-focused overview of claims about “What Is MKUltra (CIA Mind‑Control Research Program)”. This article separates well-documented findings (declassified CIA files, congressional inquiries), disputed or limited findings (scope, outcomes, and alleged crimes), and areas that remain unproven because records were destroyed or never produced.

A neutral, evidence-focused timeline of claims about COINTELPRO (FBI Domestic Surveillance Program): when the program is said to have started and ended, how it was exposed, key official reports and documents, and where historians and records disagree. This piece separates documented items, disputed points, and gaps in the public record.

A document-by-document timeline that treats the “Tobacco Industry Cover-Up of Smoking Harms” as a claim to be evaluated. This timeline lists key dates, internal documents, settlements and court findings, and explains where sources agree, conflict, or leave open questions — with primary-source citations.

A neutral, evidence-focused review testing the claim ‘Tobacco Industry Cover-Up of Smoking Harms’ against primary documents, court findings, peer-reviewed analyses, and expert commentary. This article separates what is directly documented, what is disputed, and what remains unproven.

An evidence-focused verdict on the claim that the CIA ran a mind‑control program known as MKUltra. This article separates what is documented in declassified records and congressional inquiries, what remains plausible but unproven, and which allegations are contradicted or unsupported—plus an evidence score and practical guidance for reading future claims.

This article tests claims about COINTELPRO (FBI Domestic Surveillance Program) against primary documents, court decisions, and expert accounts. We separate what is directly documented (e.g., internal memos and Senate findings), what remains disputed or inferred (e.g., responsibility for specific deaths), and which assertions lack verifiable evidence.

A neutral, evidence-focused timeline of the claim known as MKUltra (CIA Mind-Control Research Program). This article compiles declassified documents, congressional hearings, journalism, and later inquiries to show which dates and records are documented, where disputes remain, and which assertions remain unproven.