Claims that online games, apps, or platform algorithms directly cause real-world harm are common. This counterevidence review tests those claims against peer-reviewed studies, official reports, and expert analyses, separating documented findings from disputed or unproven inferences.

A careful, evidence-focused review of claims that media and online platforms routinely create moral panics about ‘internet threats.’ This article tests those claims against academic research, high‑quality reporting, and documented case studies (for example, the Momo/Blue Whale episodes), separating what is documented, what is disputed, and what remains unresolved.

A neutral, evidence-focused timeline tracing major moments when online games, apps, and other technologies were blamed for real-world harm. This article lists key dates, primary documents, platform responses, and where investigators or researchers disagree — and explains what is documented vs. what is disputed.

A careful review of the ‘Blue Whale Challenge’ panic claims: what investigative reporting, academic reviews, and official records actually show, where assertions exceed the available documentation, and which expert explanations best account for the spread of the story.

A timeline-based, evidence-focused examination of the ‘Momo Challenge’ hoax claims. This article lays out key dates, public statements, and turning points; separates documented facts from disputed or unproven assertions; and explains where reporting and official statements conflict.

An evidence-focused review of the ‘Momo Challenge’ hoax claims: this article lists the strongest arguments supporters cite, identifies their sources (police bulletins, tabloids, social posts), and shows what checks and primary documentation reveal about each claim.

This article lists and analyzes the strongest arguments people cite when blaming online games, apps, and technology for real-world harm. We treat the subject as a claim, summarize the source types (scientific reviews, platform documents, lawsuits, news reports), show how each argument can be tested, and separate what is documented from what remains disputed or unproven.

A neutral, evidence-focused review testing claims about online hoaxes, forwarded chain messages, and viral disinformation. This Counterevidence piece collects the strongest published research, fact‑check findings, and expert explanations; separates documented facts from inference; and identifies what would change the assessment.

A neutral, evidence-focused look at the main arguments people use to support claims about the ‘Blue Whale Challenge’ panic. This article lists the most-cited claims, their original sources, how investigators tested them, and what reliable reporting and official reviews actually document or dispute.