This counterevidence analysis tests claims that “Operation Mockingbird” was a large-scale CIA program that controlled the U.S. press. We review primary documents, Senate investigations, investigative reporting, and scholarly analysis to separate documented actions (wiretaps, covert foreign propaganda, some journalist contacts) from disputed or unproven extensions of the claim.

A document-focused timeline that examines claims of external involvement in the 1973 Chile coup. This article compiles declassified U.S. records, Senate and archival reports, and contemporaneous events to separate documented actions, disputed interpretations, and gaps in the public record.

A focused review of the Operation Gladio claims: what official records and court findings document, where expert disagreement or forgery allegations weaken assertions, and which high‑profile linkages (terror attacks, ‘false‑flag’ accusations, CIA direction) remain disputed or unproven.

A careful, evidence-focused review of claims about Operation Ajax (1953 Iran Coup). This article tests the claim that foreign intelligence agencies engineered the overthrow against competing or ambiguous documentary records, expert analyses, declassified files, and remaining gaps.

A careful review of the MLK assassination conspiracy claim, testing prominent allegations against primary documents, official reports, and expert analysis. This article summarizes the strongest counterevidence, notes limits and conflicts between major investigations, and explains what would change the assessment.

A neutral, evidence-focused timeline that examines claims about Operation Ajax (the 1953 Iran coup). This article compiles key dates, primary documents, and turning points from declassified U.S. and archival sources, notes areas of dispute, and scores the strength of the documentary record.

The claim that the Bilderberg Group is a ‘secret world government’ is widespread. This article tests that claim against official records, reputable journalism, and expert commentary — separating documented facts, plausible inferences, and what is contradicted or unproven.

A careful, evidence-focused review of claims about Project Stargate (psychic spying). This article tests major assertions against the declassified AIR/CIA evaluations, expert critiques by Jessica Utts and Ray Hyman, and primary program records to separate documented findings, disputed interpretations, and what remains unproven.