A neutral, evidence-focused timeline tracing how the claim framed as the “Deepfakes and ‘Nothing Is Real’ panic” emerged, key technical and media milestones, official documents and hearings, where accounts disagree, and which turning points are documented versus disputed.

A careful review of the claim “Deepfakes and ‘Nothing Is Real’ Panic” that weighs peer-reviewed studies, detection research, and policy responses. This counterevidence article separates documented findings, disputed points, and important limits — and explains what would change the assessment.

A measured verdict on the claim that deepfakes have created a “nothing is real” panic: this article separates documented incidents from plausible but unproven scenarios and identifies key gaps in evidence, with an evidence score grading the quality of documentation.

A neutral review of the claim that the pandemic was a “planned event.” This counterevidence piece tests the most-circulated documents and expert statements cited by supporters, shows what is documented, what is contradicted, and what remains unproven, with citations to primary sources and major fact-checks.

An analytical review of the most-cited arguments behind the claim that a pandemic was a “planned event.” This article lists the strongest arguments supporters point to, the original sources those arguments come from, verification tests to check them, and how the evidence holds up when reviewed against primary documents, official statements, and reputable fact-checks.

An evidence-focused look at the claim that deepfakes have triggered a ‘nothing is real’ panic. This article lists the strongest arguments people cite, the source types behind them, and simple tests researchers and journalists use to check those arguments.

An evidence-focused overview of the claim that “deepfakes” have produced a ‘nothing is real’ panic. This article neutrally summarizes the claim, traces origins and spread, separates documented cases from inference, and scores how well the claim is supported by public reports, research, and government statements.

A neutral, document-focused timeline that tracks the origins and evolution of the claim that the COVID-era pandemic was a “planned event.” This timeline lists primary exercises and source documents (Event 201, Clade X, Rockefeller scenarios), shows where evidence is documentary versus where interpretation or misattribution drives the claim, and summarizes major fact-checks and disputes.

A neutral, evidence-focused verdict on the claim that the COVID-era pandemic was a deliberate or “planned event.” We summarize what is documented, what reliable investigations say, where evidence is thin or conflicting, and what cannot be proven based on public records and published analyses.