A neutral, evidence-focused verdict on the long-running ‘Paul is Dead’ claim about Paul McCartney. This article separates documented facts from plausible but unproven inferences and contradicted claims, assigns an evidence score (0–100), and lists what would change the assessment.

An evidence-focused look at the ‘Paul Is Dead’ (The Beatles) claim: the most-cited clues (album art, lyrics, backmasked audio, radio-origin stories), where those clues originated, and how verifiable each argument is based on contemporary reporting and later investigations.

A neutral, evidence-focused overview of the ‘Paul Is Dead’ (The Beatles) claim: what proponents say, how the story began and spread in 1969, which events and documents are verified, and which parts remain unproven or contradicted.

A neutral, evidence-focused overview of the “Elvis Is Alive” claims: what supporters say, where those claims originated (books, songs, sightings), what official records show, where evidence conflicts, and why the story kept spreading in media and fandom.

A neutral, evidence-focused review of the “Paul Is Dead” claim about The Beatles. This article tests the rumor against primary contemporaneous reporting, expert commentary and documented responses from the band and major outlets, separating verified records from speculation and misreadings.

A source-by-source timeline of the ‘Paul Is Dead’ (The Beatles) claim: when the rumor surged in 1969, which campus articles and radio shows amplified it, key press responses (including Life magazine), and where the documentary record is strong versus disputed or invented.

A careful, evidence-focused timeline of the “Elvis Is Alive” claim. This article lists key dates, primary documents and public turning points, separates what is documented from what is disputed, and explains where the claim remains unsupported or unclear.

A neutral, evidence-focused look at the “Elvis Is Alive” claim. This article lists the strongest arguments supporters cite, identifies where those arguments originated, and shows how each one holds up when checked against available records, reporting, and expert statements.

A neutral, evidence-focused review of the long-running “Elvis Is Alive” claim. This article tests the claim against official records, autopsy and hospital accounts, contemporaneous reporting, medical expert analysis, and documented attempts to debunk sightings and alternative narratives.