This verdict examines claims about COINTELPRO (FBI Domestic Surveillance Program): what is strongly documented in government records and court rulings, what remains plausible but unproven, and where sources conflict or remain redacted. We separate documented facts from inference and give an evidence score with drivers.

This article tests claims about COINTELPRO (FBI Domestic Surveillance Program) against primary documents, court decisions, and expert accounts. We separate what is directly documented (e.g., internal memos and Senate findings), what remains disputed or inferred (e.g., responsibility for specific deaths), and which assertions lack verifiable evidence.

A neutral, evidence-focused timeline of claims about COINTELPRO (FBI Domestic Surveillance Program): when the program is said to have started and ended, how it was exposed, key official reports and documents, and where historians and records disagree. This piece separates documented items, disputed points, and gaps in the public record.

A neutral, evidence-focused review of the most commonly cited arguments about COINTELPRO (FBI Domestic Surveillance Program). This piece lists the arguments supporters point to, identifies the documentary sources behind them, explains how to test those sources, and separates what is well-documented from what remains disputed or unproven.

A neutral, evidence-focused overview of the claim that COINTELPRO was an FBI domestic surveillance and disruption program. This article separates what government records and Congressional investigations document, what is inferred or disputed, and why the COINTELPRO claim has become widespread.

A neutral, evidence-focused verdict on the claim framed as “Verdict on Watergate Scandal (1972–1974).” This article separates what is strongly documented about the 1972–1974 Watergate events (break-in, investigation, tapes, impeachment steps and resignation), what remains plausible but unproven, and where evidence is contradicted or absent.

A neutral, evidence-focused timeline examining claims about the Watergate Scandal (1972–1974). This article lists key dates, primary documents, and turning points; separates what is documented, disputed, or unproven; and explains where historians and official records agree or conflict.

A neutral, evidence-focused review testing claims about the Watergate Scandal (1972–1974). This article reviews primary records (tapes, court rulings, Senate hearings), major counterevidence cited by experts, limits of the documentary record, and what would change the assessment. Sources and conflicts are cited so readers can check the documents themselves.

An evidence-focused review of the most-cited arguments about the Watergate Scandal (1972–1974). This article lists the specific claims supporters point to, the types of sources they rely on (tapes, committee reports, journalism, prosecutions), and simple tests that check each argument against primary records and high‑trust reporting.

A neutral, evidence-focused overview of the claim called the “Watergate scandal (1972–1974)” — what the claim asserts, the documentary record (arrests, tapes, court rulings, congressional reports), how the story originated and spread through media and institutions, and which parts are documented, disputed, or remain unproven.